Once a passion, now merely a job

Press Box
With an era of instant information and hits meaning money upon us, sports writing has slowly lost its soul and is moving further and further from its story-telling halcyon days, writes Ewan MacKenna

The bleakness has never been about just one moment, but there is still that moment that stands out as a microcosm of where sports writing has slowly been spiraling. With 2012 just a few weeks old, the club scene was keeping many GAA journalists looking busy and useful at a relatively quiet time of year. So, a group gathered in the boardroom of a prominent company with column inches to fill across the week and a quick way to do so. What happened next depressingly went down as follows and is immensely common within this game.

A PR person entered and gave a pep talk on Lucozade before Colm Cooper was brought in and he too had wise words in case any angle regarding an energy drink had gotten away; he then preceded to blandly answer just a handful of football questions that also became bland as the journalists realised there was no point in trying for an interesting insight in such sterile and safe surrounds; before finishing, Cooper was thanked in an over-the-top manner given this was a man that had essentially been paid for doing little for those that were thanking him; and, as he left, those scribes got together, decided as a monopoly what angle would work on what days, when a single word hadn’t been uttered worthy of print on any day.

Job done.

The convenient in-house notion in such box-ticking scenarios is that everyone wins and a balance is struck. But there is a battered loser – sports writing itself. This isn’t to blame Cooper for playing it safe or any journalist who is overworked and never allowed the needed time to properly detail a subject because they’ve immediately to move onto the next one. But it is to highlight the steady decline of a section of media that not long ago highlighted all that was right with it via depth and discovery brought together with great skill and flair.

It’s far from just Gaelic games or within Ireland either but across sports and nations. A colleague in England recently bemoaned the dreaded phone call to the office after a Premier League press conference and the standard sentiment from the editor of: “What’s the line?” In other words, churn something out for a quick sell to the none-the-wiser reader even though that allows for virtually no intelligent development. These days it seems peeling the onion is hassle where it was once the cornerstone of a standalone section and special sports writing.

Every so often, scattered amidst emails from PR folk looking for a mention in return for some behind-the-scenes handout, one drops asking for advice. Sometimes from university students, sometimes from those still in school, they share a common goal of getting into sports journalism based on a sentimental view of a bygone era of big reads and colourful characters. But the most honest reply now involves telling them to run a mile for most new jobs within sports media have become about being a cog in the machine, not a story teller.

There’s an argument that suggests sports journalism has simply become a different art when in fact it is a dying art. More and more, it is evolving into a popularity contest and a numbers’ game. For instance, a large Twitter following is more and more of a must for this generates hits, which in turn generate advertising money. But some with such followings are overworked because of that appeal, giving less time to each article, hurting standards, but gaining more Twitter followers based on being seen, allowing the vicious cycle to continue.

But it’s a numbers’ game in so many other ways as well. Once, working for an online sports section, it was immediately stressed that the rule of thumb was to churn out six articles over an eight-hour shift for studies showed quantity resulted in more hits than quality. And beyond that, there is even a growing model in some newspaper titles where a league table exists for journalists based on who gets the most clicks and, by extension, they are deemed to be the most relevant and valuable to a company. But the idea of a sports journalist was never to be popular for the wrong reasons, but often to be unpopular for the right reasons.

Just ask Paul Kimmage how popular he was before being proven correct about Lance Armstrong or Paul Howard about expressing negatives about Michelle Smith to a fawning nation. Soon there’ll be no room for the next generation who want to be like them when this should be the way sports sections differentiate themselves in an era of instant information.

In the Irish sports media, Conor McGregor in recent weeks summed up that attitude better than any other. Giving him coverage attracts readership because of his outspoken views. But those outspoken views should bring about hard questions and analysis, only that might restrict access which in turn would restrict readers. It’s basically become a form of marketing where everyone keeps everyone else happy with the trade-off being a constant lowering of standards from all. In fact one of the few articles that challenged McGregor’s latest circus was also the best and there’s little coincidence there. In this instance, Ken Earley was one of the few stepping back and giving a needed insight into the reality rather than the hype.

What much of this has resulted in is a formula with coverage being swapped for convenience and quality swapped for speed. Just 15 years ago, a sports editor in a now defunct newspaper demanded three ideas for each space and only if one was good enough would it be given that space. Yet a decade later, the sports editor of that same newspaper started to take on the boardroom ideal that no article should be beyond a thousand words as the reader doesn’t have such an attention span. But given time to allow for proper research, no sports article should be able to tell its interesting story within such parameters therefore the attention span can never be expanded by good sports writing. The bar drops and drops in such a way.

There are still great sports reads but ask yourself how often you come across them? And there are still great sports writers but ask them and most talk of disillusionment. It’s not a self-serving emotion either, but it is a sentimental one based on an era that inspired them but has been allowed to slip away. And for that, it’s sports fans that have lost the most out of anyone.

Sunday Business Post
19 July, 2015

Advertisements

43 comments

  1. Out of interest, what is the market for a publication like the blizzard where quality sports writing can be found in one place. Personally I haven’t subscribed though I have been temped. I would say that the main reason I haven’t is that there is already an over supply of free football writing (of admittedly, varying interest & quality) available online.

    However as an Irishman living in London one of my main gra’s is for Michael Foley and Christy O’Connors Sunday Times GAA articles (only available online at a price that though reasonable for the content that accompanies it, pays no heed to my personal desire for that content).

    My ideal Sunday morning would be a good breakfast, a cup of coffee and to open a 10 to 20 page paper, not a match report in sight but a quality Foley or O’Connor piece on why the championship is the best/worst for 5 years, A Kimmage 3 pager about someone I’ve never heard of, a McKenna article (take any from your fine website).

    That would be well worth a few of my hard earned £££.

    But the big question is, commercial viability?

  2. Couldn’t agree more. So much of sports journalism now is simply repeated soundbites and safe platitudes from PR companies and of course commercial firms who are always “Proud sponsors of …”.
    For sure all players cannot immediately respond to each and every query – even if they were allowed to by their managers which in 90% of cases they are not.
    All too often one player – and sometimes the manager – is made available to the assembled media, and we have the same quotes (usually totally insipid, harmless and predictable) in all the papers the following day.

    Racing thankfully is very different as most trainers and jockeys are extremely helpful and often easily available for interviews.
    That sport is very much the exception though.
    There is still of course some great and incisive sports writing and God bless those who are still willing to go against the tide of bland PR and marketing candy floss.
    .

  3. Reblogged this on fredeflux's Blog and commented:
    Really nice

  4. Reblogged this on SOCCER BREEZE and commented:
    The hard-to-crunch truth!

  5. Do you have any links to examples online of what “great sports writing” would constitute? Very curious from your post!

    1. This kind of thing, Paul Kimmage interview with Greg LeMond – Sunday Times, 1 July 2007.

      The American won the Tour de France three times, twice with shotgun pellets lodged in his heart after a shooting accident. But his triumphs felt hollow as he struggled with the secret of his abuse as a child The Big Interview: Greg LeMond

      Roy Hobbs (Robert Redford): “I could have been better. I could have broken every record in the book.”

      Iris Gaines (Glenn Close): “And then?”

      Roy Hobbs: “And then? And then when I walked down the street people would’ve looked and they would’ve said, ‘There goes Roy Hobbs, the best there ever was in this game’.” – The Natural

      It is a hot Monday afternoon in July 1986 and I am sitting in a white van with my friend Andre Chappuis, driving south to the Alpine city of Grenoble, France. We have spent the night in Paris, celebrating the end of the Tour de France. The smiling face of the winner, Greg LeMond, adorns the front page of L’Equipe, the French sports newspaper.

      “What does it say about us?” Andre asks with a grin.

      “It’s a scandal,” I reply. “They’ve written four pages on LeMond and ignored us completely . . . No, I’m wrong: we’re listed in the results: Chappuis, 118th, at 2hr 17min 19sec [behind LeMond]; Kimmage, 131st, at 2hr 44min 36sec.”

      “Our place in history,” Andre says with a smile. “Don’t knock it.”

      “Sure, but I’d rather be Greg LeMond right now,” I say. “Can you imagine how good that must feel? To win the Tour de France! To be the first American to do it! Imagine the fame, the glory, the money he’s going to make. They say he’s flying back to the US for a reception with Reagan at the White House this week.”

      “Well, I can tell you what he won’t be doing,” Andre says, “and that’s sweating his bollocks off in a van with no air-conditioning for the next six hours.”

      “Too right.” I laugh. “Have you ever spoken to him?” “No,” I reply. “Me neither, but he always comes across as a pretty decent guy. And de Dieu! What a bike rider!”

      “Yeah. In my next life I want to come back as LeMond,” I observe. “I want to be born in California with legs like Eddie Merckx and looks like Robert Redford.”

      “Yes,” Andre says, “some guys get it all.” But what did we know? What do we ever know?

      GREG LEMOND is sitting in the kitchen of his splendid home in Medina, Minnesota. An interview that started with a question about his memories of the last time the Tour visited Britain – in 1994, which turned out to be his final race as a professional – has entered its fourth hour. We have been weaving our way gently through the peaks and valleys of life: his debut as a young professional in 1981; his first world title in 1983; his first Tour win and titanic battle with the great Frenchman Bernard Hinault in 1986; the hunting accident that almost killed him in 1987; his incredible return after two years in the doldrums to the Tour in 1989; his third and final triumph in the race a year later.

      Still on the agenda are the sport’s doping problem, some dubious mutual acquaintances and his much-publicised spats with his countrymen Floyd Landis and Lance Armstrong. He is starting to tire (perhaps the first time in his life he has struggled to keep pace with me) and apologises again for the tendency to wander, which has afflicted him since childhood. “I’m sorry,” he says. “What was the question again?”

      “It was an observation about your life,” I say. “Does it feel extraordinary to you? Do you feel like you have led an extraordinary life?”

      “I feel very fortunate in many ways,” he replies, “but if you knew my whole story, it has been a heartache too . . .”

      He pauses and his eyes suddenly well with tears. His wife Kathy, who has been sitting at his side for the duration of the interview, places a comforting hand on his arm. He tries to compose himself and resumes, his voice breaking.

      “It appears extraordinary, you know . . . It appeared that everything was always perfect in my life, but it’s been far from perfect. I am fortunate where I am today and I am fortunate that I have been able to look at myself in the mirror and address the stuff that I was never able to address . . . But I can tell you, compared to what I’ve been through in the past three or four years, the Tour de France is easy.”

      “You’ll have to explain that,” I say. “Well, what I mean is the whole . . . It’s very narcissistic. Racing is a very selfish, self-centred, self-glorifying thing. My wife’s life for 14 years was centred around me. It was all about me. It was all for my ego . . . I read somewhere recently that [the former Italian rider Claudio] Chiappucci lived with his mom until he was 30 and I thought, ‘God! When are we going to grow up?’ Okay, so you can look at what we did and say, ‘Well, that’s what it takes to be successful’, but is it healthy? Is it really healthy?

      “There are a lot of unhealthy people that are driven to sports and they are driven by their own demons, their own past. You see it in business too; I’ve known some very successful, wealthy people and they are the most unhappy people you will ever meet. They can’t ever get enough money. They can’t ever get enough glory. They can’t ever fill the hole.

      “There was a part of me with a hole that I could never fill and it almost destroyed me, but I have been able to work through a lot of those difficulties and it feels so empowering now that nobody can hold anything over me. I don’t give a shit what people say, because it really doesn’t matter. My life is about my wife, my kids and the few friends that I have.”

      He smiles at Kathy and pulls the ring on a can of Dr Pepper.

      “What was the hole?” I ask.

      IT IS A warm Monday morning in July 1989 and Greg LeMond is staring at the bedroom ceiling of a plush hotel in Paris on the morning after his second triumph in the Tour de France. The night has been short. He has not slept well. He never sleeps well. The elation he felt on the Champs-Elysees has abated. He is wondering about the hole. Will this second Tour victory fulfil him? It didn’t in 1986.

      He glances at the phone. When is he going to call? The shadow has not lifted.

      The hours have been hectic since they applauded him on the podium: so many hands to shake and commitments to fulfil; so many cameras and microphones stretching to record his words. He will be front-page news around the globe this morning; the nuts and bolts of LeMond explained in the four corners of Le Monde.

      The story of how the boy from Lakewood, California, swaps his passion of skiing for cycling and is immediately acclaimed as a natural. The story of his parents, Bob and Bertha, and his two sporting sisters and the genes bestowed on them. The story of his first trip to Europe in 1978 and the wonder that envelopes him when he sees the Tour de France. The story of the objectives he lists that summer on a yellow pad:

      1. Place well for experience in the 1978 junior world championships. (He finishes ninth.)

      2. Win the 1979 junior world championships. (He wins.)

      3. Win the 1980 Olympic road race in Moscow. (America boycotts the Games.)

      4. Win the world professional championships by the age of 22 or 23. (He finishes second in 1982, when he is 21, and wins in 1983.)

      5. Win a first Tour de France by the age of 24 or 25. (He finishes second in 1985, at 24, and wins in 1986.)

      The story of the hunting accident in 1987 when he comes within 20 minutes of bleeding to death after being shot by his brother-in-law. The story of the 37 lead pellets that remain in his body, two in the lining of his heart. The story of his emergency appendectomy a few months later.

      The story of his return to racing in 1988, when he struggles among the also-rans and is sidelined from the Tour with injury. The story his return to form in 1989 when he wins the Tour by eight seconds with a brilliant performance in the final stage of the race, a time trial through the streets of Paris. The story of a champion. The story of what happens now and where he races next. The story of Greg LeMond. But not the story. There will be no mention of the secret that continues to haunt his life.

      GREGORY JAMES LEMOND is 13 years old. His father is a real-estate broker. His mother is a mom. Home is a house shared with his sisters, Kathy and Karen, in Washoe Valley, Nevada. It is ranch country and the boy enjoys the outdoor life; flyfishing for brook trout in the stream behind their home; hunting and trapshooting and backpacking in summer; downhill skiing in winter. He is Gregory James LeMond, wholesome as apple pie. What would it take to blow a hole in this boy’s life?

      Meet Ron from Lake Tahoe. Ron has been a friend of the family since 1969. They go hunting and fishing and skiing together. Ron is a stand-up guy, and when Bob and Bertha’s marriage begins to creak, Ron is there to fill the void. He is plying Greg with attention and preparing him for manhood. He is manipulating his mind with books and magazines and sexual talk that the boy finds strangely stimulating. And then . . .

      LeMond is not sure how long he was subjected to the abuse – “it might have been three months or a year and three months” – but remembers that it ended in April or May of 1975. His parents had stopped arguing and were getting on well again. He thinks they must have noticed the change in his behaviour, but the abuse was never discussed. A few months later, at a ski camp near Vancouver, Canada, he was informed that cycling was an ideal complement to skiing in the off-season.

      He earned $130 cutting logs, bought a Raleigh Grand Prix and took it for a ride. A few days later, his father went to the bike shop and they were soon training regularly together and travelling as a family to races. It was the door to a new life.

      “Cycling was a way for me to reinvent myself,” he says. “It was the first time I really had my dad in my life. It united my parents, united my family, and I think that’s what really drove me. It felt so good to feel good about yourself and do something that my parents were proud of.”

      He started making lists and ticking off his targets. He dreamt every night about the world’s great racers and the cols (mountain passes) of the Tour de France. His life unfolded like a wondrous fairy tale. By the age of 25 he had it all: a great wife, a beautiful son, the rainbow jersey of world champion, le maillot jaune of the Tour de France champion. But the shadow of Ron never left him.

      “I wanted to be seen as a good person,” LeMond says, “and never wanted to let people down, but I found it hard to handle the fame or adulation. I didn’t feel worthy of it. I was ashamed by who I thought I was because I felt partly responsible [for the abuse] and I was never able to enjoy the stuff I should have been able to enjoy. My first thought when I won the Tour was: ‘My God, I’m going to be famous’, and then I thought, ‘He’s going to call’. I was always waiting for that phone call. I lived in fear that anyone would ever find out.”

      And finally they did. Six weeks ago he was driving with Kathy to a hotel in Malibu, California, on the eve of his appearance as a witness for the US AntiDoping Agency at an arbitration hearing into alleged doping by Landis, last year’s Tour winner, when his phone rang; odd accent, southern twang.

      “Hello.” “Greg?” “Yeah, this is Greg.” “Hi Greg, this is your uncle.” “My uncle?!?” he exclaimed, confused. “This is your uncle. Do you remember me?”

      “Who is this?” “This is your uncle and I’m going to be there tomorrow and we can talk about how we used to play hide the weenie.”

      “Who the f*** is this?” The line went dead. LeMond exploded with rage.

      “He couldn’t stop shaking,” Kathy recalls. “I didn’t think he would be able to testify. Our lawyer sat up in the lobby with me until one in the morning; Greg was so shook up, he could not fill out the police report. I was worried about him.”

      The next day LeMond showed the court his phone and the number of the person who had called him. It belonged to Will Geoghegan, Landis’s friend and business manager. He was sacked on the spot.

      LeMond was front-page news again.

      THE MONTH is July 2001. Seven seasons have passed since LeMond’s last bike race and he is about to be replaced as America’s pre-eminent cyclist by Lance Armstrong. LeMond has never been close to the Texan and he finds himself at the centre of a storm when he is informed by a journalist that Armstrong has been working with Michele Ferrari, an Italian sports doctor who was about to stand trial on doping charges. Ferrari was eventually cleared last year.

      “The only thing I said about Lance was that I was disappointed he was seeing Ferrari,” LeMond explains. “I mean, who wouldn’t be? We’re talking about a sport that had been brought to its knees [by the Festina doping scandal three years earlier]. Why would you associate with someone like that if you wanted to portray an image that the sport was trying to change?”

      Two weeks later Armstrong phoned him and an angry spat ensued.

      “Greg, this is Lance.” “Hi, Lance, what are you doing?” “I’m in New York.” “Ah, okay.” “Greg, I thought we were friends.” “I thought we were friends.” “Why did you say what you said?” “About Ferrari? Well, I have a problem with Ferrari. I’m disappointed you are seeing someone like Ferrari. I have a personal issue with Ferrari and doctors like him. I feel my career was cut short. I saw a teammate die. I saw the devastation of innocent riders losing their careers. I don’t like what has become of our sport.”

      The fallout was massive. Fans who had once venerated LeMond wrote angry blogs accusing him of sour grapes. A couple of prominent businessmen he regarded as friends phoned and advised him to stay on-side. And then he received a call from John Burke, the chief executive of Trek, the company with a licensing agreement with LeMond to manufacture, market and distribute LeMond Racing Cycles.

      Burke was in a difficult position. Trek also sponsored Armstrong and his US Postal team. Criticism of the great cancer survivor was not good for business. LeMond was reminded of the clause in his contract with the company that invalidated the contract if he damaged Trek’s interests. Armstrong’s people were insisting on an apology. LeMond tried to resist, but eventually caved in. In August 2001 an apology to Armstrong was issued. LeMond read it and wept.

      The two years that followed were the worst of his life. Ron was still lurking on his shoulder. He still hadn’t told Kathy or anyone about the abuse and he began smoking and drinking and became severely depressed. “I got so drunk one night where I wanted to tell my wife, because I knew that if I didn’t, something was going to happen,” he says. “I couldn’t do it. I said, ‘I’ll tell you on my death bed’. I just ran.

      “I left home and ran from my family. I felt I needed to lose everything: my wife, my kids, my house, every cent I had. I thought that if I put myself in the gutter, I would find myself. I did some stuff against my wife I wasn’t proud of. Kathy knew instantly what was going on. My wife is an angel; I’ve always felt that I didn’t deserve her, but it was only when I felt I might lose her that I came home and broke down and told her everything.

      “She begged me to see a therapist. I read a couple of books by Alice Miller – The Drama Of The Gifted Child and The Truth Will Set You Free – and cried the whole way though them. It was me. I went through a period where I needed to coast and get stronger, and the last four years has been the proudest period of my life. I’m holding people accountable now. I’ve hired an investigator to find the guy who abused me, to get him on a [paedophile] list. Nobody is going to take advantage of me. I’m not taking shit from anybody.”

      THE CONVERSATION has returned to the Tour de France in 1994, the last time the race visited Britain and his last race as a professional.

      The end is rarely easy for any professional sportsman and he left Europe and returned to the US with few fond memories of his last three seasons. There was talk of a new drug, EPO, fuelling the peloton and LeMond could no longer compete.

      “I went to Europe with a dream,” he says, “and I know there was doping in the 80s and I’m certain a lot of riders were doing stuff and that cortisone was a drug of choice, but I was always able to perform and win races against those guys. At 19 years old I finished third in the Dauphine [France’s second-biggest stage race]; at 20 I won the Tour de L’Avenir by 10 minutes and finished second in the worlds [championships]. I was fortunate I was successful right away and didn’t get drawn into that.

      “By 1993 I was just so fatigued and I don’t know if it was because everybody was on EPO, I really don’t, but I was checked out for every possible problem there could be health-wise. I went to see a sports doctor and he said, ‘Greg, there is nothing wrong with you; if you want to race well, you go to [Dr X], you need to contact him, because if you’re not on EPO, you don’t have a chance’.”

      “And did you?” I ask. “No.” “You never considered it?” “I had already won three Tours – and I don’t know if this is on the record – but I don’t think I could have survived a positive drug test. I’m talking psychologically.” “Why do you not want that on the record?” I ask.

      “Because it has to do with my sexual abuse.”

      “I think you can put that on the record,” says Kathy. “Everybody knows what happened.”

      Her husband’s eyes well with tears. “I know,” he counters, “but it’s something I wasn’t prepared to come out with until I was forced to, until that phone call [from Geoghegan] . . . I’ve dealt with a lot of therapy on this and . . .”

      He pauses to compose himself. “We’ve done a lot of talking about this,” Kathy says. “Why wouldn’t Greg have gone to [Dr X]? Why not? I think Greg was carrying such a load of shame that, like he said, he couldn’t have survived a positive drug test, he probably couldn’t. He had to have something to hold on to that was pure and good about himself, and cycling was that.”

      “I wasn’t prepared for what happened with the Floyd Landis thing,” LeMond continues. “I met his family last year at the Tour of Georgia and they seemed such a nice family. I even suspended belief when he won that stage [in last year’s Tour, Landis mounted a spectacular breakaway in a stage to Morzine the day after he had lost eight minutes to his nearest rivals]; I thought there was a chance that this could be a cleaner Tour. But then he tests positive and I instantly get about 20 calls from journalists, and having a muzzle is no fun, so I tell them what I think.”

      “And then you get a call from Floyd?” “I thought it was a prank call at first. I kept saying, ‘Come on, who is this?’ It took me about five minutes before I realised it was him. So he says, ‘I’m trying to find out where you’re coming from’. I said, ‘What do you mean?’ He said, ‘Why are you speaking out like this?’ I said, ‘I hate to say this, Floyd, but you’ve got an A and a B positive [riders’ urine samples are tested a second time if a positive outcome is returned in the first test] for synthetic testosterone; I don’t think you’re going to get out of this’.

      “So I’m telling him, ‘Don’t do what Tyler Hamilton did [the American cyclist was caught doping and banned from the sport, but has always denied using drugs], because you might get away with it, but if you have any conscience, it’s going to kill you in the end. If you can come clean, you could be the one person that saves the sport. The sport is already dying, but you could change it. “‘But if you don’t, you are going to be known as the Ben Johnson of cycling – the first Tour de France winner that has ever been stripped of the title, and I don’t know, but I couldn’t survive that’. And that was when I went into my story and the secret that nearly destroyed me.”

      “It was a pretty frank admission,” I suggest.

      “Because Floyd wasn’t angry,” he says. “He was like a deer in the headlights. I think he was really calling to ask, ‘What should I do?’ This was a phone call looking for guidance. He will deny that now, but I can tell you, it’s true.

      “I told him my story. I said, ‘I’m telling it to you because by keeping it a secret it nearly killed me’. He said, ‘Greg, if I come clean, I would destroy all of my friends and hurt so many people’. I said, ‘Floyd, I’m 15 years older than you. Do you think your friends in cycling are your friends? They’re just acquaintances. You think your whole life is cycling, but it’s just a small part of it. There is so much more beyond that’.

      “And that’s how we finished the deal. He asked me to keep the conversation between us, and that suited me fine. I had no intention of going public with the abuse.”

      “But things turn ugly,” I say. “Yeah, somebody told Floyd that I had been speaking to Wada [the world antidoping body] and he posted this stuff about me on his website [ “The facts that he (LeMond) divulged to me would damage his character severely and I would rather not do what has been done to me. However, if he ever opens his mouth again and the word Floyd comes out, I will tell you all some things that you will wish you didn’t know.”] He never apologised and never took it down. I decided I would testify about the conversation we’d had.”

      “On the eve of your appearance you get the call from Will Geoghegan?”

      “Yeah.” “What effect did that have on you?” “It was one of the most emotionally disturbing things that has ever happened to me and I’m hoping that the LA police and the DA [district attorney] are going to charge both Floyd and Will, because under his testimony, Floyd essentially admitted he was right there with Will all the way through. How else would he get the number?”

      The exact involvement of Landis in the making of the call has yet to be determined.

      “The thing that really bugs me,” Kathy says, “is that he has never apologised. He knew damn well how traumatic this is for Greg.”

      “He actually said under testimony that what I had told him had traumatised him!” LeMond snorts. “I just hope the DA goes after him. The whole thing is sick – the cover-up, the threats – it’s just sick. This sport needs to bleed to death before it can rebuild. And even then, I don’t know . . .” AS THE interview draws to a close, the first shadows of evening have descended on LeMond’s lawns. Almost nine hours have passed since we began this morning and I am feeling almost as tired as when we used to race as he escorts me to my car. We have both started riding our bikes again, pale shadows of our former selves. I have always felt comfortable with my shadow. LeMond, at last, feels comfortable with his.

      1. You’re right, that’s a beautiful piece of writing. Thanks so much for taking the time to share.

    2. Also, trying to find a couple of interviews by Paul Howard from the late Sunday Tribune in Ireland, couple of boxing pieces with Kevin McBride the weekend he fought and beat Mike Tyson, and Nicolai Linca, who won a controversial gold in Melbourne. Just remarkable stuff that aren’t just interviews but tell the tale of the person, the interview, the social side, the past, the present etc. I’ll ask Paul if he still has them and send them on if he does. But for me that’s what sports writing used to be about. It’d cost more for fewer pieces but it would be worth every penny in the long run.

  6. What do you think of popular sports blogs like Grantland or FiveThirtyEight? I think they usually have interesting perspectives and the content there feels a lot more organic than most of the “company-approved” stuff you see on ESPN.

    1. Liked Grantland over the years although I believe Simmons recently left so evolution will be interesting. FiveThirtyEight not for me, while believing there of course is room for stats in sport, it reduces art to binary code. Problem here though, both under one umbrella of ESPN that does much to take away from good sports journalism and we are also talking 99 per cent US content also which from my perspective doesn’t do much for my main sporting interests in Europe.

  7. Reblogged this on tbhtrisya and commented:
    dream

  8. agesgist · · Reply

    Reblogged this on agesgist.

  9. Reblogged this on TRUTH ODG.

  10. This was a great post and so true. The meaning and passion behind sports writing has been declining.

  11. Excellent article, which highlights the click-baiting, masked as sports journalism.
    I know of a few young journalists who have went down the sport path and have regretted doing so. Online articles are encouraged to be short, controversial and often not grounded by truth. I miss the old style of journalism from the likes of Con Houlihan and dare I say, Tom Humphries, who brought colour and insight into a world, we knew little of.
    The introduction of Twitter and other social media platforms have ensured that we know everything there is to know about star players, whether they are passed out in the middle of the street or making an egg for breakfast.
    The endless inane autobiographies have ensured that we no longer want to hear more about these personalities and it is taken away from the prestige of sports writing.
    In Ireland, the GAA have basically shut the door on the media, but using it to their advantage when required, like last Saturday when every media outlet reported that Michael Murphy would not play against Galway, when in fact it was never in doubt. Players do not give insights, because it is against the rules of the squad, just ask Kevin Cassidy, who was kicked off the Donegal team for talking to a journalist. The scene with Jim McGuinness and Declan Bogue at the end of the 2012 All-Ireland final epitomised how sports writers are viewed by managers and this would never have happened a decade ago.
    So, sports fans are left clicking and clicking, with no news to report, just gossip, tittle-tattle and the odd opinion, sports writing is in its final throes.

  12. I really agree with you

  13. Reblogged this on smokethemix.

  14. I miss the day of reading the long in depth article in Sports Illustrated. Now everything is quick hit, twitter, then done.

  15. Very interesting point. Though I think there are people out there with great passion, the platforms for expression are becoming smaller and less facilitating, while we’re codded into believing they’re opening up.

  16. Oi em breve mas posts obrigada!!

  17. I’m sorry but it’s not just Sports Journalism, it’s all job across the board. Gone are the days when working in a clothing store was great for extra $$$, now management keeps tab on each sale you ring up. Pay had dropped on the pretends you make targets set by management and you will be rewarded with a “bonus” still below your old wage.

    Real estate is a sales game
    Advertising is a money making game
    Police is all about reaching targets
    Teachers are under pressure to get results but can no longer discipline rude children

    Long gone are the days you worked for the love of it! It’s all about the money!!

  18. Reblogged this on lovetruthgod and commented:
    Search for passion not a career!

  19. Have you ever read “The Sportswriter” by Jonathan Ford?

  20. It should always stay a passion,
    If you wouldn’t mind give my premier league page a look 🙂

  21. If ones passionate about the job you have, then you’ll never work a day in your live – perhaps a bit naive/optimistic but definitely makes one think!

  22. Now, with Social Media open to all…anybody can write.

    1. Big difference between writing and responsible, fact-checked, trustworthy and legally complicit journalism. Also a big difference between writing and actually having the funding to give the time and travel to and gain the access for proper journalism. Finally, writing well and good journalism aren’t something everyone can do simply by having social media. That demeans a skillful profession. The equivalent would be saying there’s no need for good restaurants because in the days of cheap stoves and electricity anyone can cook.

  23. sailenyi · · Reply

    Reblogged this on sailenyi.

  24. izzybone23 · · Reply

    Sports reporting is usually aweful. The questions a sports journist asks are 99% of the time softball aweful questions and the athlete responds with a boring answer and we move on. Sports writers need to be more confortational and ask hard hitting questions when needed. Arent we all sick of hearing, what did it take to win the game, or how do u feel after that preformance. Uggf sports writers for the most part are vanilla twats!!! Boring as hell. It doesnt matter that theres are 100000 sports writers and blogger now with the internet, that isnt the issue. Its that no sports reporter is willing to be bold and ask great questions.

  25. This was a great read!! I am a sportswriter, but I do it for fun and because I love it. Check it out guyshttp://joeysjetblog.com/2015/08/17/rex-ryan-opens-up-about-his-leave/

  26. […] Once a passion, now merely a job. […]

  27. […] Source: Once a passion, now merely a job […]

  28. […] Source: Once a passion, now merely a job […]

  29. aryanchaurasia348 · · Reply

    Reblogged this on Welcome.

  30. […] Source: Once a passion, now merely a job […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: